Posts Tagged ‘google analytics’

Google security fail

April 6th, 2010

I use Google for e-mail and for analytics.  I also use other features but those are my two big ones.  For the past two days, I’ve had what I consider a pretty significant security issue and I’m not sure where it is originating from.  It is this:

What’s the major problem? I’m not epgeorge007@gmail.com. I have a different e-mail address I use. It doesn’t appear that epgeorge007@gmail.com and I are sharing a common Internet connection. I only log in to Google from my home Internet connection. When I googled to see who epgeorge007@gmail.com was, they weren’t located in the same state. I should not be logged in to their account. When I discovered this yesterday, I logged out. (And then I didn’t log in to another account. I didn’t need to use Google)

I should not be logged in to some one else’s account and I should not be able to view their Google Analytics information. Does anyone have any idea where this problem might be originating from?

Compete.Com… Good but not always accurate

December 3rd, 2008

Compete, Alexa and Quantcast are the big three sites in terms of people trying to get a feel for your traffic. They all have varying degrees of accuracy.

In October 2008, Compete said we got 6,215 unique visitors which, um, no? So off. Quantcast had us at about 33,000. If you estimate just US based traffic (which Compete.Com might be doing), we still had 18,400 or so according to Quantcast. Google Analytics had us getting 34,690 unique visitors and 39,708 visitors during October 2008. Google Analytics said that 21,913 of those visits were from Americans. Both Google and Quantcast’s numbers make sense. (And both pull directly from our site.) Compete.Com just way off.

Even Alexa in terms of Rank fares better and more accurate when measured against Quantcast. It is off by about 40,000 compared to the 100,000+ that Compete.Com is off.

Compete continues to be off in other areas. Compete.Com says that the top five phrases driving traffic to Fan History are:

1. cincoflex
2. may chang
3. 373/111
4. sleeping with the enemy draco hermione
5. naomi novik astolat

Er. No. Google Analytics says those searches gave us the following hit totals for October 2008:

1. cincoflex – 3 visits
2. may chang – 0 visits
3. 373/111 – 0 visits
4. sleeping with the enemy draco hermione – 0 visits
5. naomi novik astolat – 1 visit

Google Analytics tells me that the top five search phrases leading to visits for October 2008 actually were:

1. dbz wiki – 220 visits
2. sakura lemon – 189 visits
3. naruto fanfiction – 131 visits
4. adult fanfiction - 120 visits
5. cassandra claire – 114 visits

Compete could mean total searches pulling up Fan History? Maybe? Really, that could be what they say when they talk about keywords driving traffic to our site, searches that people do which pull us up? Probably not but let’s compare to what Google Webmaster Tools says are the top searches pulling us up:

# % Query Position
1 11% dbz wiki 5
2 10% fandom history 2
3 9% bandflesh 7
4 8% fan history 2
5 8% fanhistory 2

Nope. Nothing on the list that Compete has and Webmaster stats make much more sense there.

Just not impressed with Compete’s October numbers as I’m waiting to see them update our November numbers.

Canonical URL by SEO No Duplicate WordPress Plugin