During the past few days, we’ve been working on trying to visualize our organizational patterns on Fan History in order to understand our own patterns, how we conceptualize fandom, to check for organizational consistency, create tools to help users understand our organizational patterns, to identify areas where we lack stub content.
Thus, we’re creating mindmaps like the one below that do that. The purpose isn’t to get a complete tree. (Some of the categories have 10, 50, 200 different sub categories. It isn’t timely.) It is to get enough of one to do the above. The one below is one of these mind maps. It looks at how we conceptualize blogs. Click on it for the link to the full size
For blogs, we tend to organize by fandom type (music, sports, actors), by social networking site, by blogging site, by bloggers. The inclusion of American bloggers on the top level probably isn’t the best place for it and later, some one should probably move that down into Bloggers -> Bloggers by country -> American bloggers. LiveJournal is actually much deeper than you’re seeing here. As we post others part of our tree, that might become a bit more obvious.
A lot of the blogs that we have are generally listed around a topic. We have few fandom specific categories for blogs like that. It would be nice to see that expanded, to have blogs listed beyond the ones present on social networking sites.
If you have any feedback on this tree, any questions about how it developed, we would love your feedback. Do the organic patterns we’ve developed make sense? Is this construction too artificial? Is it not logical? And if you’re really motivated, we’ve really like that feedback on the relevant talk pages for those categories.